Why Mario’s Got A Bee In His Bonnet – by David Stockman

Posted from: David Stockman’s Contra Corner

Mario had a bee in his bonnet this morning. Apparently, the chorus of German voices pointing to the obvious—- that his policies are killing savers, insurance companies, pension funds and banks—-got his dander up:

“We have a mandate to preserve price stability for the whole of the euro zone, not only for Germany,” he said. “We obey the law, not the politicians, because we are independent.”

There you have in brief the whole rationalization for the monetary madness that Draghi and his kindred central bankers have unleashed on the world. They claim that their rubbery statutory mandates to pursue the equivalent of economic apple pie, such as ‘price stability’, leads in a straight, unbreakable line of logic and monetary science to the lunacy of negative 0.4% money market rates and $90 billion per month of bond-buying.

No it doesn’t. There is no scientific linkage whatsoever—–just an ideological leap based on a Keynesian demand model that conveniently delegates all power to the central bankers’ soviets.

Just as in the case of the Humphrey-Hawkins Act in the US, the ECB’s enabling statute does not define price stability in quantitative terms—-nor does it specify the inflation index to be used or the duration to be measured. Even when the ECB’s Governing Council attempted to formulate a quantitative definition of ‘price stability’, it only got slightly more specific in defining it as something between zero and 2% over the course of a year.

“Price stability is defined as a year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for the euro area of below 2%.”

By its own definition, therefore, the eurozone does not have a “deflation” problem or even a “lowflation” threat. For the last 16 years, the core HICP has averaged 1.5%, and during the last year when allegedly the deflationary sky was falling, the core consumer inflation index has risen by 1.0%.

So all of Draghi’s arm-waving about the “law” is just risible obfuscation. Surely “Mario and the NIRPs” are not suggesting that monetary policies so radical that they were not even conceivable a decade ago are warranted because core inflation is temporarily tracking at a mere 50 bps below its long-term trend; or that it should be measured in weeks and months, not a year or more; or that the ECB should be fighting the huge blessing to EU consumers of the globally originated collapse in imported oil and materials inflation.

Indeed, the truth is real simple. Virtually all of the sub-trend performance of the consumer price index during the last year is due to the nearly 3% drop in import prices. And that has been an unequivocal benefit to the European economy!

So not only was Mario pouting because the phony threat of deflation has not blinded the Germans to the destructive impact of his policies, but he actually let loose a wild pitch that needs no amplification. To wit, Draghi is on a power trip so naked that he actually threatened even greater monetary mayhem if people don’t stop questioning his authority:

“Any time the credibility of a central bank is perceived as being put into question, the result is a delay in the achievement of its objectives — and therefore the need for more expansion,” the ECB president told reporters in Frankfurt, raising his voice. “Our policies work, they are effective. Just give them time.”

There you have it—–school yard bluster. And its all in the name of a primitive economic notion that only someone nurtured in the Italian Treasury and sent off to finishing school at Goldman Sachs could actually believe. To wit, that more debt everywhere and always is the elixir that will create economic growth and wealth.

In fact, Mario believes himself to be in the economic growth business via the agency of pumping more credit into the eurozone economy whether warranted or not. Apparently, there are no interest rates too low if they spur more credit growth:

“Our monetary-policy measures have been supporting growth……. With rare exceptions, monetary policy has been the only policy in the last four years to support growth………Overall, the monetary policy measures in place since June 2014 have clearly improved borrowing conditions for firms and households, as well as credit flows across the euro area…….Credit continues, it’s pretty solid,” he said. “Together with a dramatic fall in rates and increasing volumes, this shows are measures are indeed quite effective.”

Let’s see. Private sector loans outstanding in the eurozone totaled EUR 10.69 trillion in February compared to EUR 10.60 trillion a year earlier. That computes to a gain of exactly……..0.6%!

Put differently, when you are not counting angels on the head of a pin you rarely see one. So it is not surprising that Mario is seeing the debt elixir at work where the statistics show hardly a shadow:

Broad financing conditions in the euro area have improved. The pass-through of the monetary policy stimulus to firms and households, notably through the banking system, is strengthening…..Bank credit has been going up since second quarter of 2014. Rejections have been going down. This shows that our measures have indeed been most effective.”

So even if European households and businesses needed to lug around more debt, which they clearly don’t, the ECB has literally savaged savers and pensioners in the name of a hardly measureable fraction.

Obviously, there is an altogether different issue here. The European private sector is not borrowing because interest rates were too high two years ago when QE incepted, or even four years ago when Draghi delivered his “whatever it takes” ukase.

In fact, since mid-2012 euro LIBOR has essentially been pegged at a rounding error. The notion that the difference between +0.2% on the lending reference rate and -0.2% matters to any actual business or household is preposterous.

The fact is, lending growth is tepid because the eurozone private sector is impaled on Peak Debt. The boom in lending happened 7-15 years ago. And even after plateauing at Peak Debt, the growth rate since the year 2000 still computes to 5% per annum.

So there is another reason why Europe isn’t growing and its one the central bank can do nothing about. Namely, the 19 governments of the eurozone and the super-state in Brussels have essentially outlawed it. If you want to know why growth is so tepid just examine the eurozone’s massive barriers to enterprise and work in the form of taxes, regulation, welfare state extravagance, crony capitalist subsidies and privileges and labor law protectionism.

In a word, the problem is not that private sector credit is too niggardly; it’s that the leviathan state has crushed the ingredients of supply side enterprise and growth. When the state budget consumes 50% of GDP, and its tentacles of regulation and intrusion penetrate most of the rest, the central bank’s printing press is impotent.

Nevertheless, when your only tool is a hammer, everything does look like a nail. So Draghi and the NIRPs will undoubtedly keep on printing until they blow the euro-based financial markets sky high.

That the testy Italian is clueless about the massive bond market bubble his policies are creating was starkly evident in another gem from today’s presser. Mario’s message to the Germans was to suck it up and that he doesn’t have anything to do with low rates anyway:

It is clear that pension funds and others, insurance companies, are seriously affected by the low interest rates – I would caution them not to blame on low rates everything that has gone wrong in the sector – but they are seriously affected……Low interest rates are a symptom of low growth and low inflation. If we want to return to higher interest rates we need to return to higher growth and higher inflation. …

Does this blithering fool believe he has repealed the law of supply and demand? That the ECB can plunge into the European bond market to the tune of $90 billion per month and not impact the price of debt?

Worse still, does he not recognize that the ECB massive intrusion into the bond market has also triggered second order dynamics that drastically amplify this artificial bid? To wit, the bond vigilantes of yore have become today’s repo financed front-runners, piling into everything today that Mario and the NIRPs will be buying tomorrow.

As of two days ago, the German 10-year bund was trading at a 13 bps yield and the Italian bond at 140 basis points. Neither of these rates make a wit of economic sense, and most surely they are not owing to “low growth”.

Instead, their prices have been driven into the financial stratosphere by the ECB’s big fat bid and the front runners’ scramble to scoop-up the unspeakable windfall gains that clueless Mario has bestowed on the casino.

Likewise, has Draghi not noticed that while bank loans to households and operating businesses have barely blipped upwards there has been an explosion of high yield bond issuance? Never mind that almost to the last euro the proceeds have been used to fund M&A rollups, buyouts and other financial engineering schemes, not an expansion of productive assets.

But here’s the thing. The world’s greatest monetary charlatan is nearly out of tricks. He pointedly backed off from helicopter money today because the Germans have obviously drawn a line in the sand. And he can’t push NIRP much further without breaking what remains of Europe’s sclerotic socialist banking system. And if he tries even more negative carry money under TLTRO it will assuage the margin pressure on European banks but not make the eurozone’s debt besotted households and businesses a wit more credit-worthy or inclined to borrow.

So this foolishly naïve believer in the elixir of debt is actually pushing on a credit string while inflating the mother of all bond bubbles. There is not a chance that the ECB can extract itself from this dangerous corner, nor continue down the current path much longer.

Indeed, when the casino front runners finally conclude that the Draghi jig is up, the European bond market will plunge into a bidless pit as they race to cash in their capital gains and liquidate their repo borrowings.

Then there will be a whole hive of angry bees in Draghi’s bonnet, German speaking ones in the lead.

Cash Ban Isn’t Anti-Crime – By LewRockwell.com

Cash Ban Isn’t Anti-Crime – It’s Designed To Enable The State Crime Of Savings Confiscation
By LewRockwell.com

Some politicians want to ban cash, arguing that cash is helping criminals. The first steps in that direction are the withdrawal of big denomination notes and the limits imposed on cash payments. Proponents of a ban on cash claim that this will help fight criminal transactions — involved in money laundering,terrorism, and tax evasion. These promises of salvation are used to get the general public to agree to a society without cash. But there is no convincing proof for the claim that the world without cash will be a better one. Even if undesirable behavior is indeed financed by cash, you still need to answer the question: will the undesirable behavior disappear without cash? Or will those who commit the undesirable acts take to new ways and means to reach their goal?

Take the example of the 500 euro note. If we do away with it, won’t those who wish to use cash pay with five 100
euro notes instead? Or ten 50 euro notes? And what about the costs imposed on the large majority of respectable people, if you put a ban on their cash? Using the same logic, should we ban alcohol, because some
can’t handle it properly?

It’s Really about Central Banks The plan to restrict the use of cash, or to abolish it step by step, has nothing to do with the fight against crime. The real reason is that states (and their central banks) want to introduce negative interest rates.

Although central banks have long pursued inflationary policies that devalue the debt owed by governments,
negative interest rates offer a new and powerful tool to do this. But, to make negative interest rates work well,
you have to get rid of physical cash. Otherwise, if you apply negative rates on bank deposits, customers in the short or long run will try to avoid the costs that negative rates impose on their bank deposits. So, depositors will, in many cases, hoard cash. To block this last escape route, proponents of the ban on cash want to do away with it.

Incidentally, some reputable economists are supporting the plan, claiming that the “natural rate” has become a
negative rate. Because of that, central banks were forced to push interest rates below zero, being the only way
to foster growth and employment. The assertion that the balanced interest rate has become negative doesn’t
stand up to a critical examination, though. It is inherently impossible that the balanced interest rate is negative. Market rates, which entail the balanced rate, can fall below zero, but not the balanced rate itself.

The policy of negative rates is no cure for the economy but causes massive economic problems.

Banning cash is infringing on the freedom of citizens on a massive scale. In withdrawing cash, the citizen is
bereft of choice for his payments. After all, the state has the monopoly on the production of money. There is no
competition on cash. Thus, nobody but the state can satisfy the demand for money by citizens. If the state bans cash, all transactions must be executed electronically. For the state to see who buys what when and who travels where is then only a small step away.

The citizen thus becomes completely transparent and his financial privacy is being lost. Even the prospect that a citizen can be spied upon at any time is an infringement on his right to freedom. Cash helps to protect the citizen from an unfettered intrusiveness by the state. If the state increases taxes too much, citizens, at least, have the option to avoid the tribulation by paying in cash. The knowledge that citizens can do so, makes states hold back a little.

States will give up any restraint once cash has been banned. The justified concern isn’t at all rendered obsolete
by the cases of Sweden and Denmark, where the cashless society is said to function to its perfection. The
citizens of those countries can still use foreign cash if they want.

The plan to ban cash — step by step — is a sign of the fundamental ailment of our time: the state is destroying
more and more of the freedom of citizens and businesses, once it has turned into a territorial monopolist and
highest judge of all conflicts.

The fight to keep cash may bring something good, though: it will shed light on the need to take the power away
from the state as we know it, by applying the same principles of law on its actions as on those of each and every
citizen. That way, the state’s monopoly on producing cash would come to an end and the citizen wouldn’t need to
worry that he may be deprived of his cash against his will.

Source: Cash Banned, Freedom Gone – LewRockwell.com
Copyright © 2015 Subsidium LLC . All Rights Reserved